what ia the different between 5005 Aluminum and 5052 aluminum
Both 5052 aluminum and 5005 aluminum are aluminum alloys. They have a very high 98% of their average alloy composition in common.
For each property being compared, the top bar is 5052 aluminum and the bottom bar is 5005 aluminum.
Mechanical Properties
Brinell Hardness |
|
46 to 83 |
|
28 to 64 |
Elastic (Young’s, Tensile) Modulus, GPa |
|
68 |
|
68 |
Elongation at Break, % |
|
1.1 to 22 |
|
1.1 to 23 |
Fatigue Strength, MPa |
|
66 to 140 |
|
38 to 86 |
Poisson’s Ratio |
|
0.33 |
|
0.33 |
Shear Strength, MPa |
|
120 to 180 |
|
70 to 130 |
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa |
|
190 to 320 |
|
110 to 230 |
Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa |
|
75 to 280 |
|
41 to 210 |
Thermal Properties
Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g |
|
400 |
|
400 |
Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C |
|
190 |
|
180 |
Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C |
|
650 |
|
650 |
Melting Onset (Solidus), °C |
|
610 |
|
630 |
Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K |
|
900 |
|
900 |
Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K |
|
140 |
|
200 |
Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K |
|
24 |
|
24 |
Electrical Properties
Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS |
|
35 |
|
52 |
Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS |
|
120 |
|
170 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
Base Metal Price, % relative |
|
9.5 |
|
9.5 |
Calomel Potential, mV |
|
-760 |
|
-740 |
Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material |
|
8.6 |
|
8.3 |
Embodied Energy, MJ/kg |
|
150 |
|
150 |
Embodied Water, L/kg |
|
1190 |
|
1190 |
Common Calculations
Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 |
|
1.7 to 69 |
|
2.3 to 22 |
Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 |
|
41 to 590 |
|
12 to 320 |
Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points |
|
14 |
|
14 |
Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points |
|
50 |
|
50 |
Strength to Weight: Axial, points |
|
19 to 33 |
|
11 to 23 |
Strength to Weight: Bending, points |
|
27 to 38 |
|
19 to 31 |
Thermal Diffusivity, m2/s |
|
57 |
|
82 |
Thermal Shock Resistance, points |
|
8.3 to 14 |
|
4.9 to 10 |